Changes in trunk appearance following surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

PURPOSE: To assess the postoperative appearance of the trunk in surgically treated scoliosis patients after a 2 year follow-up using reliable indices and compare the results with 6-month follow-up. METHODS: Forty-six Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients (female; preop mean age 14.4 ± 2.4 years) who underwent a posterior spinal fusion from 2009 to 2018 were included in this study. All had Lenke 1A thoracic curves, with surface topography taken preoperatively, 6 months and 2 years postoperatively. To assess spinal deformity, we measured the proximal thoracic, main thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar Cobb angles in the frontal plane from spinal X-rays and inclinometer angles in the thoracic and lumbar regions. To assess trunk deformity, Back Surface Rotation (BSR) and Trunk Lateral Shift (TLS) were computed along the trunk. We analysed the effect of age, height, weight, Cobb angle, length of follow-up, and surgical technique. We also compared correction rates (CRs) of the spinal and trunk measurements after 6 months and 2 years. RESULTS: Good spinal correction was achieved, with Cobb angles decreasing in the whole cohort. CRs for TLS and BSR were positive (denoting improvement) for 76% and 48% of patients, respectively, after 2 years. Compared with 6 months, the mean TLS CR increased while there was no improvement for BSR on average. We found no significant association after 2 years between truncal index CRs and clinical variables (age, height, weight, preoperative Cobb angles) or surgical technique. However, there were significant correlations between the CRs of TLS and the main thoracic Cobb angle (r = 0.35), and between the CRs of BSR and thoracic inclinometer angle. CONCLUSION: Although more than 55% of the TLS was corrected after 2 years of follow-up, the BSR remained stable over time and the persistence of rib hump on the back surface could be observed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Optimized braces for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A study protocol of a prospective randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) is a 3D deformity of the spine that affects 3% of the adolescent population. Conservative treatments like bracing aim to halt the progression of the curve to the surgical threshold. Computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) methods for brace design and manufacturing are becoming increasingly used. Linked to CAD/CAM and 3D radiographic reconstruction techniques, we developed a finite element model (FEM) enabling to simulate the brace effectiveness before its fabrication, as well as a semi-automatic design processes. The objective of this randomized controlled trial is to compare and validate such FEM semi-automatic algorithm used to design nighttime Providence-type braces. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Fifty-eight patients with AIS aged between 10 to 16-years and skeletally immature will be recruited. At the delivery stage, all patients will receive both a Providence-type brace optimized by the semi-automatic algorithm leveraging a patient-specific FEM (Test) and a conventional Providence-type brace (Control), both designed using CAD/CAM methods. Biplanar radiographs will be taken for each patient with both braces in a randomized crossover approach to evaluate immediate correction. Patients will then be randomized to keep either the Test or Control brace as prescribed with a renewal if necessary, and will be followed over two years. The primary outcome will be the change in Cobb angle of the main curve after two years. Secondary outcomes will be brace failure rate, quality of life (QoL) and immediate in-brace correction. This is a single-centre study, double-blinded (participant and outcome assessor) randomized controlled trial (RCT). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05001568.

Automated design of nighttime braces for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with global shape optimization using a patient-specific finite element model.

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is a complex three-dimensional deformity of the spine, the moderate forms of which require treatment with an orthopedic brace. Existing brace design approaches rely mainly on empirical manual processes, vary considerably depending on the training and expertise of the orthotist, and do not always guarantee biomechanical effectiveness. To address these issues, we propose a new automated design method for creating bespoke nighttime braces requiring virtually no user input in the process. From standard biplanar radiographs and a surface topography torso scan, a personalized finite element model of the patient is created to simulate bracing and the resulting spine growth over the treatment period. Then, the topography of an automatically generated brace is modified and simulated over hundreds of iterations by a clinically driven optimization algorithm aiming to improve brace immediate and long-term effectiveness while respecting safety thresholds. This method was clinically tested on 17 patients prospectively recruited. The optimized braces showed a highly effective immediate correction of the thoracic and lumbar curves (70% and 90% respectively), with no modifications needed to fit the braces onto the patients. In addition, the simulated lumbar lordosis and thoracic apical rotation were improved by 5° ± 3° and 2° ± 3° respectively. Our approach distinguishes from traditional brace design as it relies solely on biomechanically validated models of the patient's digital twin and a design strategy that is entirely abstracted from empirical knowledge. It provides clinicians with an efficient way to create effective braces without relying on lengthy manual processes and variable orthotist expertise to ensure a proper correction of scoliosis.

Automatic assessment of scoliosis surgery outcome on trunk shape using left-right trunk asymmetry.

PURPOSE: To present a novel set of Left-Right Trunk Asymmetry (LRTA) indices and use them to assess the postoperative appearance of the trunk in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients. METHODS: We hypothesize that LRTA measurements provide complementary information to existing trunk asymmetry indices when documenting the outcome of scoliosis surgery. Forty-nine AIS patients with thoracic curves who underwent posterior spinal fusion were included. All had surface topography scans taken preoperatively and at least 6 months postoperatively. We documented spinal curvature using Radiographic Cobb angles, scoliometer readings and coronal balance. To evaluate Global Trunk Asymmetry (GTA), we used the standard measures of Back Surface Rotation (BSR) and Trunk Lateral Shift (TLS). To measure LRTA, we identified asymmetry areas as regions of significant deviation between the left and right sides of the 3D back surface. New parameters called Deformation Rate (DR) and Maximum Asymmetry (MA) were measured in different regions based on the asymmetry areas. We compared the GTA and LRTA changes with those in spinal curvature before and after surgery. RESULTS: The GTA indices, mainly TLS, showed improvement for more than 75% of patients. There was significant improvement of LRTA in the shoulder blades and waist regions (95% and 80% of patients respectively). CONCLUSION: We report positive outcomes for LRTA in the majority of patients, specifically in the shoulder blades and waist, even when no reduction of BSR is observed. The proposed indices can evaluate local trunk asymmetries and the degree to which they are improved or worsened after scoliosis surgery.

The Effect of Implant Density on Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Fusion: Results of the Minimize Implants Maximize Outcomes Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) can be treated with instrumented fusion, but the number of anchors needed for optimal correction is controversial. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized study that included patients undergoing spinal fusion for single thoracic curves between 45° and 65°, the most common form of operatively treated AIS. Of the 211 patients randomized, 108 were assigned to a high-density screw pattern and 103, to a low-density screw pattern. Surgeons were instructed to use ≥1.8 implants per spinal level fused for patients in the high-implant-density group or ≤1.4 implants per spinal level fused for patients in the low-implant-density group. The primary outcome measure was the percent correction of the coronal curve at the 2-year follow-up. The power analysis for this trial required 174 patients to show equivalence, defined as a 95% confidence interval (CI) within a ±10% correction margin with a probability of 90%. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean percent correction of the coronal curve was equivalent between the high-density and low-density groups at the 2-year follow-up (67.6% versus 65.7%; difference, -1.9% [95% CI: -6.1%, 2.2%]). In the per-protocol cohorts, the mean percent correction of the coronal curve was also equivalent between the 2 groups at the 2-year follow-up (65.0% versus 66.1%; difference, 1.1% [95% CI: -3.0%, 5.2%]). A total of 6 patients in the low-density group and 5 patients in the high-density group required reoperation (p = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of spinal fusion for primary thoracic AIS curves between 45° and 65°, the percent coronal curve correction obtained with use of a low-implant-density construct and that obtained with use of a high-implant-density construct were equivalent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Pre-operative parameters influencing vertebral body tethering outcomes: patient's characteristics play an important role in determining the outcomes at a minimum of 2 years post-op.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to determine preoperative predictors of good radiographic outcomes in VBT patients at a minimum 2-year follow-up. METHODS: From a single-center dataset, we reviewed patients who underwent VBT from January 2014 to November 2018. Data analysis included age, gender, Risser grade and biometric data. Radiographically, maximum Cobb angle, C-DAR and apical vertebral and disc wedging were measured preop and at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were divided into two cohorts following two different outcome measures: (1) vertebral growth modulation, those patients that growth modulated or corrected ≥ 5° and those who did not; and (2) Maximum Cobb angle at 2 years, < and ≥ 40°. Student T and Chi2 tests were used for comparison and a multiple linear correlation test was implemented between statistically significant variables. RESULTS: 79 patients were recruited. 26 patients (33%) did growth modulate their spine at 2-year follow-up. These patients were significantly younger, and more skeletally immature with less height (147 cm vs 155 cm; p < 0.0001), weight (38 kg vs. 45 kg; p = 0.0009) and BMI (17 vs 18.8; p = 0.0229) as those who did not. Multiple linear regression model with these variables resulted in a moderate correlation (r2 = 0.234). 67 patients (85%) finished at a 2-year follow-up with a maximum Cobb angle < 40°. These patients were also younger and skeletally immature. We found significant differences in outcome 2 regarding the average preoperative maximum Cobb angle (48.5° ± 9.5 vs. 59.1° ± 10), average C-DAR (7 ± 1.5 vs. 8.5 ± 2.1), average apical vertebral wedging (6.5° vs. 8.3°), average vertebral/disc wedging ratio (1.5 vs. 2.4) and the average immediate postoperative Cobb angle (25° vs. 38°). These variables predicted a 36% of the variation in final Cobb angle measurement at a 2-year follow-up (r2 = 0.362). CONCLUSION: Curve severity determined by a preoperative C-DAR, preoperative Cobb angles and immediate postoperative Cobb angle are significantly related to curves < 40° at a minimum 2-year follow-up, while the potential to growth modulate the spine is more dependent on skeletal maturity, lower body weight and lower BMI. These patients' characteristics should be considered preoperatively.

A Surgical Treatment Algorithm for Restoring Pelvic Balance and Health-related Quality of Life in High-grade Lumbosacral Spondylolisthesis: Prospective Multicenter Cohort of 61 Young Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter cohort-study. OBJECTIVE: We propose an evidence-based surgical algorithm for achieving normal pelvic balance while optimizing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in high-grade spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The principles of surgical treatment for young patients with high-grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis remain unclear. There is a growing body of evidence supporting the central role of pelvic balance in the postural control and biomechanics of subjects with high-grade spondylolisthesis. METHODS: This retrospective study assessed a multicenter cohort of 61 patients with high-grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis. Classification and regression tree analysis was used to identify objective criteria associated with pelvic balance and HRQoL after surgery. RESULTS: The most important predictor of a postoperative balanced pelvis was a postoperative L5 incidence ≤63.5 degrees. With postoperative L5 incidence ≤63.5 degrees,a residual slip percentage 9% and performing an L5-S1 posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF)/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) increased the likelihood of achieving a balanced pelvis postoperatively. When L5 incidence was 63.5 degrees,a balanced pelvis was most likely achieved with fusion limited to L5 proximally, residual slip percentage ≤40%, and residual lumbosacral angle 98 degrees. Predictors of postoperative HRQoL were the preoperative HRQoL score, L5 incidence and slip percentage. CONCLUSIONS: A surgical algorithm is proposed to achieve normal pelvic balance, while optimizing HRQoL. The first step during surgery is to assess L5 incidence and if L5 incidence is <65 degrees, the next step depends on the pelvic balance. With a preoperative balanced pelvis, it is important not to reduce completely the slip percentage by leaving a slip percentage ≥10%. When the preoperative pelvis is unbalanced, a TLIF/PLIF at L5-S1 is recommended to facilitate correcting the angular deformity at L5-S1. If L5 incidence is ≥65 degrees,a TLIF/PLIF at L5-S1 should be performed to correct the angular deformity at L5-S1, and fusion should ideally end at L5 proximally, in addition to performing gradual reduction of the slip percentage. If fusion up to L4 is required, a lumbosacral angle ≥100 degrees is key.

Parents can reliably and accurately detect trunk asymmetry using an inclinometer smartphone app.

PURPOSE: An inclinometer smartphone application has been developed to enable the measurement of the angle of trunk inclination (ATI) to detect trunk surface asymmetry. The objective was to determine the reliability and validity of the smartphone app in the hands of non-professionals. METHODS: Three non-professional observers and one expert surgeon measured maximum ATI twice in a study involving 69 patients seen in the spine clinics to rule out scoliosis or for regular follow-up (10-18 y.o., Cobb [0°-58°]). Observers were parents not familiar with scoliosis screening nor use of an inclinometer. They received training from a 4-minute video. Intra and inter-observer reliability was determined using the generalizability theory and validity was assessed from intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), agreement with the expert on ATI measurements using Bland-Altman analysis, and correct identification of the threshold for consultation (set to ≥6° ATI). RESULTS: Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability coefficients were excellent ϕ = 0.92. The standard error of measurement was 1.5° (intra-observer, 2 measurements) meaning that a parent may detect a change of 4° between examinations 95% of the time. Comparison of measurements between non-professionals and the expert resulted in ICC varying from 0.82 [0.71-0.88] to 0.84 [0.74-0.90] and agreement on the decision to consult occurred in 83 to 90% of cases. CONCLUSION: The use of a smartphone app resulted in excellent reliability, sufficiently low standard error of measurement (SEM) and good validity in the hands of non-professionals. The device and the instructional video are adequate means to allow detection and regular examination of trunk asymmetries by non-professionals.

Is quality of life after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis affected by the presence of a concomitant low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis non-surgically treated? A retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The HRQoL after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is not affected by the presence of concomitant isthmic spondylolisthesis non-surgically treated. Improvement in QoL after surgery was similar for AIS patients with and without concomitant spondylolisthesis. The purpose is to compare preoperative and postoperative Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) scores in operated AIS patients with and without concomitant isthmic spondylolisthesis. METHODS: A retrospective study of a prospective cohort of 464 individuals undergoing AIS surgery between 2008 and 2018 was performed. All patients undergoing surgery for AIS with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. We excluded patients with prior or concomitant surgery for spondylolisthesis. HRQoL scores were measured using the SRS-22 questionnaire. Comparisons were performed between AIS patients with versus without concomitant spondylolisthesis treated non-surgically. RESULTS: AIS surgery was performed for 36 patients (15.2 ± 2.5 y.o) with concomitant isthmic spondylolisthesis, and 428 patients (15.5 ± 2.4 y.o) without concomitant spondylolisthesis. The two groups were similar in terms of age, sex, preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles. Preoperative and postoperative HRQoL scores were similar between the two groups. HRQoL improved significantly for all domains in both groups, except for pain in patients with spondylolisthesis. There was no need for surgical treatment of the spondylolisthesis and no slip progression during the follow-up duration after AIS surgery. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing surgical treatment of AIS with non-surgical management of a concomitant isthmic grade I spondylolisthesis can expect improvement in HRQoL scores, similar to that observed in patients without concomitant spondylolisthesis.

A Dangerous Curve: Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Brace Treatment in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Observational Cohort study. OBJECTIVES: We aim to document the abandon and irregular compliance rate towards brace treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on AIS progression. METHODS: We reviewed a database of AIS patients recruited between March and September 2020. We included AIS patients under brace treatment according to SRS criteria. The patients were divided in 2 cohorts: those with self-reported Good-Compliance (GC) to treatment and those who had a Bad-Compliance (BC). Data analysis included biometric and radiographic data at first visit and last follow-up and percentage of progression. Unpaired student-t tests and Chi2 were used for comparison. RESULTS: 152 patients met inclusion criteria. 89 patients (age:12.1y.o.±1.4) reported good adherence to treatment, while 63 patients (age:12.7y.o.±1.8) were not compliant. Within the BC group, 18 patients reported irregular brace wear, while 45 had completely abandoned treatment (abandon rate of 29%). The GC cohort started treatment with a mean main thoracic (MT) curve of 26° and finished with 27°. The mean difference between measurements was +.65°±7.5; mean progression rate was -4.6%. However, the BC cohort started with a mean MT curve of 27° and finished with 32°, with a mean increase of +5°±8 and a mean progression rate of -13%. The differences between the 2 cohorts were statistically significant (P = .0002). Six patients from the BC group progressed and were offered surgery. CONCLUSION: The abandon rate of brace treatment in AIS significantly increased during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic. Patients who voluntarily discontinued treatment had significant increases in curve progression and surgical indication rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Development of a model of interprofessional support interventions to enhance brace adherence in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: a qualitative study.

PURPOSE: Brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is recognized as effective if the brace is worn as prescribed (20 to 23 hrs/day). Because of its negative biopsychosocial impact on adolescent patients' quality of life, brace adherence is a common problem (average bracewear of 12 hrs/day). The purpose of this paper is to develop an interprofessional support intervention model to enhance brace adherence in adolescents with scoliosis. METHODS: We enrolled 9 health professionals working with braced patients to participate in individual interviews. Interview guides were built following the Information-Motivation-Strategy Model (DiMatteo et al., Health Psychol Rev 6:74-91, 2012) and the Interprofessional Care Competency Framework (Education UoTCfI, Toronto Acad Health Sci Network, 2017). Thematic analysis was performed to identify the most relevant concepts for designing the intervention model. A panel of 5 clinical experts was recruited to review and validate the intervention model. RESULTS: Participants suggested educational, motivational, functional, psychological and interprofessional teamwork strategies to improve the support provided to patients and parents and potentially increase brace adherence. Using the emerging themes and their relationships, we designed an Interprofessional Adherence Support (IPAS) intervention model that identifies the actors, activities, structure and intended impacts of the intervention. According to the expert panel, the IPAS model is highly relevant to respond to the brace adherence problem and has potential for implementation in practice. CONCLUSION: We designed an interprofessional support intervention model based on professional perspectives in response to the brace adherence problem in adolescents with scoliosis. Plans for implementation of the IPAS model at our scoliosis clinic are under development and considered essential for improving brace treatment outcomes.

Biomechanical Effects of Thoracolumbosacral Orthosis Design Features on 3D Correction in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Comprehensive Multicenter Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter numerical study. OBJECTIVE: To biomechanically analyze and compare various passive correction features of braces, designed by several centers with diverse practices, for three-dimensional (3D) correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A wide variety of brace designs exist, but their biomechanical effectiveness is not clearly understood. Many studies have reported brace treatment correction potential with various degrees of control, making the objective comparison of correction mechanisms difficult. A Finite Element Model simulating the immediate in-brace corrective effects has been developed and allows to comprehensively assess the biomechanics of different brace designs. METHODS: Expert clinical teams (one orthotist and one orthopedist) from six centers in five countries participated in the study. For six scoliosis cases with different curve types respecting SRS criteria, the teams designed two braces according to their treatment protocol. Finite Element Model simulations were performed to compute immediate in-brace 3D correction and skin-to-brace pressures. All braces were randomized and labeled according to 21 design features derived from Society on Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment proposed descriptors, including positioning of pressure points, orientation of push vectors, and sagittal design. Simulated in brace 3D corrections were compared for each design feature class using ANOVAs and linear regressions (significance P ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: Seventy-two braces were tested, with significant variety in the design approaches. Pressure points at the apical vertebra level corrected the main thoracic curve better than more caudal locations. Braces with ventral support flattened the lumbar lordosis. Lateral and ventral skin-to-brace pressures were correlated with changes in thoracolumbar/lumbar Cobb and lumbar lordosis (r =- 0.53, r = - 0.54). Upper straps positioned above T10 corrected the main thoracic Cobb better than those placed lower. CONCLUSIONS: The corrective features of various scoliosis braces were objectively compared in a systematic approach with minimal biases and variability in test parameters, providing a better biomechanical understanding of individual passive mechanisms' contribution to 3D correction.

3D Radiological Outcomes and Quality of Life of Patients With Moderate Idiopathic Scoliosis Treated With Anterior Vertebral Growth Modulation Versus Bracing: Two-Year Follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that anterior vertebral body growth modulation (AVBGM) achieves 3D deformity correction after 2-year follow-up while brace treatment limits curve progression for moderate idiopathic scoliosis (30-50°). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: For idiopathic scoliosis, bracing and AVBGM have overlapping indications in skeletally immature patients with moderate scoliosis curve angles, creating a grey zone in clinical practice between them. The relative 3D deformity control performance over a 2-year period between these fusionless treatments is still uncertain. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospective idiopathic scoliosis patients database, recruited between 2013 and 2018 was performed. Inclusion criteria were skeletally immature patients (Risser 0-2), with Cobb angles between 30° and 50° and a 2-year follow-up after bracing or AVBGM. 3D radiological parameters and health related quality of life (HRQoL) scores were evaluated. Unpaired t test was used. RESULTS: Thirty nine patients (12.7 ± 1.3 y.o.) with Cobb angles more than or equal to 30° treated with brace and 41 patients (11.8 ± 1.2 y.o.) with presenting Cobb angles less than or equal to 50° who received AVBGM were reviewed. The statistical analysis of 3D deformity measurements showed that at 2-year follow-up, only the 3D spine length and both sides apical vertebral heights changed significantly with brace treatment. While AVBGM treatment achieved statistically significant correction differences in thoracic and lumbar Cobb angles, TrueKyphosis, 3D spine length, and selective left apical vertebral height ( P < 0.05). 35% of brace patients had a curve progression of more than 5° at final follow-up while it was 0% for AVBGM. HRQoL assessment showed no statistically significant differences between pre and post SRS-22 total scores for each group ( P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Even though these two cohorts are not fully comparable, bracing seems to control progression for a significant portion of patients with moderate scoliosis curves, while AVBGM significantly corrected and maintained 3D deformity parameters at 2-year follow-up.

The classification of scoliosis braces developed by SOSORT with SRS, ISPO, and POSNA and approved by ESPRM.

PURPOSE: Studies have shown that bracing is an effective treatment for patients with idiopathic scoliosis. According to the current classification, almost all braces fall in the thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) category. Consequently, the generalization of scientific results is either impossible or misleading. This study aims to produce a classification of the brace types. METHODS: Four scientific societies (SOSORT, SRS, ISPO, and POSNA) invited all their members to be part of the study. Six level 1 experts developed the initial classifications. At a consensus meeting with 26 other experts and societies' officials, thematic analysis and general discussion allowed to define the classification (minimum 80% agreement). The classification was applied to the braces published in the literature and officially approved by the 4 scientific societies and by ESPRM. RESULTS: The classification is based on the following classificatory items: anatomy (CTLSO, TLSO, LSO), rigidity (very rigid, rigid, elastic), primary corrective plane (frontal, sagittal, transverse, frontal & sagittal, frontal & transverse, sagittal & transverse, three-dimensional), construction-valves (monocot, bivalve, multisegmented), construction-closure (dorsal, lateral, ventral), and primary action (bending, detorsion, elongation, movement, push-up, three points). The experts developed a definition for each item and were able to classify the 15 published braces into nine groups. CONCLUSION: The classification is based on the best current expertise (the lowest level of evidence). Experts recognize that this is the first edition and will change with future understanding and research. The broad application of this classification could have value for brace research, education, clinical practice, and growth in this field.

Automatic bone maturity grading from EOS radiographs in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) is a deformation of the spine and it is routinely diagnosed using posteroanterior and lateral radiographs. The Risser sign used in skeletal maturity assessment is commonly accepted in AIS patient's management. However, the Risser sign is subject to inter-observer variability and it relies mainly on the observation of ossification on the iliac crests. This study proposes a new machine-learning-based approach for Risser sign skeletal maturity assessment using EOS radiographs. Regions of interest including right and left humeral heads; left and right femoral heads; and pelvis are extracted from the radiographs. First, a total of 24 image features is extracted from EOS radiographs using a ResNet101-type convolutional neural network (CNN), pre-trained from the ImageNet database. Then, a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm is used for the final Risser sign classification. The experimental results demonstrate an overall accuracy of 84%, 78%, and 80% respectively for iliac crests, humeral heads, and femoral heads. Class activation maps using Grad-CAM were also investigated to understand the features of our model. In conclusion, our machine learning approach is promising to incorporate a large number of image features for different regions of interest to improve Risser grading for skeletal maturity. Automatic classification could contribute to the management of AIS patients.

Patient outcomes in idiopathic scoliosis are associated with biological endophenotypes: 2020 SOSORT award winner.

PURPOSE: Bracing is the treatment of choice for idiopathic scoliosis (IS), unfortunately factors underlying brace response remain unknown. Clinicians are currently unable to identify patients who may benefit from bracing, and therefore, better molecular stratification is critically needed. The aim of this study is to evaluate IS patient outcomes at skeletal maturity in relation to biological endophenotypes, and determine specific endophenotypes associated to differential bracing outcomes. This is a retrospective cohort with secondary cross-sectional comparative studies. METHODS: Clinical and radiological data were collected from 563 IS patients, stratified into biological endophenotypes (FG1, FG2, FG3) based on a cell-based test. Measured outcomes were maximum Cobb angle at skeletal maturity, and if severe, spinal deformity (≥ 45°) or surgery was attained. Treatment success/failure was determined by standard progression thresholds (Cobb ≥ 45° or surgery; Cobb angle progression ≥ 6°). Multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate associations between endophenotypes and clinical outcome. RESULTS: Higher Cobb angles at maturity for FG1 and FG2 patients were observed (p = 0.056 and p = 0.05), with increased likelihood of ≥ 45° and/or surgery for FG1 (OR = 2.181 [1.002-4.749] and FG2 (OR = 2.141 [1.038-4.413]) compared to FG3. FG3 was 9.31 [2.58-33.61] and 5.63 [2.11-15.05] times more likely for bracing success at treatment termination and based on the < 6° progression criterion, respectively, compared to FG1. CONCLUSION: Associations between biological endophenotypes and outcomes suggest differences in progression and/or bracing response among IS patients. Outcomes were most favorable in FG3 patients. The results pave the way for establishing personalized treatments, distinguishing who may benefit or not from treatment.

Braces Designed Using CAD/CAM Combined or Not With Finite Element Modeling Lead to Effective Treatment and Quality of Life After 2 Years: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

STUDY DESIGN: Single-center prospective randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the computer-aided design/manufacturing (CAD/CAM) brace design approach, with and without added finite element modeling (FEM) simulations, after 2 years in terms of clinical outcomes, 3D correction, compliance, and quality of life (QoL). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: .: Previous studies demonstrated that braces designed using a combination of CAD/CAM and FEM induced promising in-brace corrections, were lighter, thinner, and covered less trunk surface. Yet, their long-term impact on treatment quality has not been evaluated. METHODS: One-hundred twenty adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients were recruited following Scoliosis Research Society standardized criteria for brace treatment; 61 patients in the first subgroup (CAD) were given braces designed using CAD/CAM; 59 in the second subgroup (CAD-FEM) received braces additionally simulated and refined using a patient-specific FEM built from 3D reconstructions of the spine, rib cage and pelvis. Main thoracic (MT) and thoraco-lumbar/lumbar (TL/L) Cobb angles, sagittal curves, and apical rotations were compared at the initial visit and after 2 years. Patient compliance and QoL were tracked respectively by using embedded temperature sensors and SRS-22r questionnaires. RESULTS: Forty-four patients with CAD-FEM braces and 50 with CAD braces completed the study. Average in-brace correction was 9° MT (8° CAD-FEM, 10° CAD, P = 0.054) and 12° TL/L (same for both subgroups, P = 0.91). Out-of-brace 2-year progression from initial deformity was <4° for all 3D measurements. Sixty-six percent of all cases (30 CAD-FEM, 35 CAD) met the ≤5° curve progression criterion, 83% (38 CAD-FEM, 43 CAD) stayed <45°, and 6% (5 CAD-FEM, 1 CAD) underwent fusion surgery. 3D correction, compliance, and QoL were not significantly different between both subgroups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: After 2 years, patients with braces designed using CAD/CAM with/without FEM had satisfying clinical outcomes (compared to the BrAIST study), 3D corrections, compliance and QoL. A more comprehensive optimization of brace treatment remains to be accomplished. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

A freehand ultrasound framework for spine assessment in 3D: a preliminary study.

X-ray imaging is currently the gold standard for the assessment of spinal deformities. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a freehand 3D ultrasound system for volumetric reconstruction of the spine. A setup consisting of an ultrasound scanner with a linear transducer, an electromagnetic measuring system and a workstation was used. We conducted 64 acquisitions of US images of 8 adults in a natural standing position, and we tested three setups: 1) Subjects are constrained to be close to a wall, 2) Subjects are unconstrained, and 3) Subjects are constrained to performing fast and slow acquisitions. The spinous processes were manually selected from the volume reconstruction from tracked ultrasound images to generate a 3D point-based model depicting the centerline of the spine. The results suggested that a freehand 3D ultrasound system can be suitable for representing the spine. Volumetric reconstructions can be computed and landmarking can be performed to model the surface of the spine in the 3D space. These reconstructions promise to generate computer-based descriptors to analyze the shape of the spine in the 3D space.Clinical Relevance- We provide clinicians with a protocol that could be integrated in clinical setups for the assessment and monitoring of AIS, based on US image acquisitions, which constitutes a radiation-free technology.

3D reconstruction of the human trunk for designing personalized braces : Precision study.

The customized design of braces for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treatment requires the acquisition of the 3D external geometry of the patients' trunks. Three body scanning systems are available at CHU Sainte-Justine in Montreal: a fixed system of InSpeck Capturor II LF digitizers and two portable scanners, BodyScan and Structure Sensor. The aim of this study is to compare them by evaluating their accuracy and repeatability. To achieve this, we placed 46 surface markers on an anthropomorphic manikin and scanned it three times with each system. We also measured the 3D coordinates of the same markers using a coordinate measuring machine (CMM), serving as ground-truth. We evaluated the repeatability and accuracy of the three systems: the former, by measuring the bidirectional mean distance between the three surfaces acquired with a given modality; the latter, by calculating the residual normal distance separating each of the 3D surfaces and the CMM point cloud. We also compared texture mapping accuracy between InSpeck and Structure Sensor by examining the CMM point cloud versus the marker 3D coordinates selected on the trunk surface. The results show good accuracy and repeatability for all three systems, with slightly better geometric accuracy for BodyScan (p-value ≈ 10-6). In terms of texture mapping, InSpeck showed better accuracy than Structure Sensor (p-value = 0.0059).